Friday, 11 September 2026

This Day

It is hard to believe it has been 25 years since the attacks on 9/11. It feels like just yesterday. Yet so many things have changed. On that day Americans were united in a tragedy that affected all of us. Now it seems we have lost that feeling of unanimity. We have lost that sense of mutual purpose.

That day there were so many people who acted heroically, helping to protect and care for their fellow human. It was a spirit you saw shining on Flight 93 when a group of passengers succeeded in diverting a plane meant to be used as a weapon, sacrificing themselves in the process. You saw it in the helping hands stretched out to ease the way for those trying to make it down the twin towers. It was there among the first responders who arrived at ground zero.

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani:




We are faced with a decision this November. A decision that will affect us all for years to come.

This James Talarico interview on Jimmy Kimmel has been censored by the Trump administration’s FCC. Is this really the kind of America you want for your children? Is this the kind of America those people who sacrificed themselves for on 9/11 would be proud of?  An America that oppresses any opposition to those in power?




Isn’t it time we take our country back?




This has never been just Trump’s America. It belongs to all.  The people on 9/11 fought for all of us.  Isn't it about time we do the same?

And isn't it time to remember who our true friends are?




35 comments:

  1.       "It belongs to all."

    That is most definitely not the message being propounded at Trump's party in Texas these past few days.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They say that actions speak louder than words. I think Trump and his cohorts actions have been giving the same message for a while now. Like those voters in South Carolina said, it's time people stood up for their rights.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was listening to Fareed Zakaria today and he mentioned that apparently Putin had suggested to Chinese leaders that they dump Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds in an effort to destabilize the US economy. Not surprised that Putin would suggest this and I was pleased to note that China refused. At least they understand that the global economy is still very much intertwined and the repercussions would hurt them as well.

    I also note that Trump is still completely clueless as to Putin's motives in his actions. Not surprised there.

    As someone mentioned to me, the US has been adept at putting in place the least competent of people in the most critical of places.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Talarico for president. Just a passing thought.

    ReplyDelete
  5.       "Talarico for president."

    First things first.  He needs to win his race for Senator first.  Then we'll think 'bout whether he can pull an Obama move on the U.S.Presidency.
                               ________________________________

          "I also note that Trump is still completely clueless as to Putin's
          motives in his actions."


    Or, maybe not.  He still thinks he's gonna seize the Presidency by hook or by crook ('course he chickened out the first time; he very well might TACO again this time.)  But, once he's a dictator, as he currently figures it to happen, he thinks the dynamics will change and Putin and Xi and Kim will wanna buddy up to him and divide the world's spoils between the three of them.  (In the end, Kim will get left out of course.)

          "…the US has been adept at putting in place the least
          competent of people in the most critical of places."


    I believe the Trumpkan/Republicans refer to that as "American Exceptionalism".

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe the Trumpkan/Republicans refer to that as "American Exceptionalism".

    ROFL!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It seems that a Russian oligarch paid for Don Jr's wedding party.

    Trump is saying no big deal.

    Not surprising.

    ReplyDelete
  8.       "Trump is saying no big deal."

    We'll have to wait and see if the Trumpkan/Republicans running for office (and their loyal voters) echo this "no big deal" attitude.

    (I've been expecting leaks of information damaging to Trump to increase as Trump becomes more vulnerable to potential discipline.  I've suspected a lot of people may be sitting on evidence of malfaction in Trump's administration and family on the theory that there was no reason to leak--wasn't gonna get any follow up anyway, and then they'd be in trouble with Trump for nothing gained.  A Democratic Congress (big "D" on "Democratic") could change that calculation.)

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Supreme Court declined to take up Trump's request for "pre-approval" of his plan to meddle with the mail ballots in theupcoming mid-term elections.  That leaves Trump's plan tied up in the various district and appelate courts which have been almost universally critical.  Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas would have let him proceed.  Brett Kavanaugh said there wasn't time to effectively implement the plan.  (Of course, implementing the plan was never the plan; the plan was to seize the ballots under some pretext yet to be disclosed.)

    Don't for a minute think that Trump will give up on blocking a Democratic win in November.  He's got another gambit ready and waiting in case of this contingency.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Houthis have made inroads into blocking the Red Sea route for Saudi oil. Gas prices will continue to rise along with everything else, especially if the Houthis succeed in blocking the Suez Canal.

    Costco has started to ration motor oil. They know what is coming. Makes those prepper YouTube channels look prescient.

    Yes, I think you are right, Trump has a backup plan. Will Republicans go for it?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Trump has banned various news outlets from The White House, including CNN.

    Precursor to nullifying the elections or declaring martial law?

    ReplyDelete
  12.       "Precursor…?"

    Probably just Trump being bored.  Trying to redirect headlines to himself and his edicts during a slow news week.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Or trying to deflect from the news that we almost stopped and boarded a Chinese vessel that an intelligence report partly compiled by AI suggested the ship was carrying components to build a nuclear weapon?

    Meanwhile, Mike Johnson has recessed the House to avoid a vote on impeachment Hegseth. He obviously has his priorities. Dealing with AI isn't one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It was doing that thing yesterday where I couldn't post.

    The polls are not Trump's friends now. I hope they are right.

    Mayhe they are unhappy with the rendition of immigrants. Maybe they are unhappy with gas prices, and the prices of everything else as a result. Maybe they noticed that Trump was even alienating Canada.

    We'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  15.       "It was doing that thing yesterday where I couldn't post."

    I had noticed your test posts.

    Trump has defied the public polls before.  They've had trouble predicting the turnout levels of his supporters.  Perhaps they've managed to get their models aligned with real world performance now.  One can only hope.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It seems Trump has come up with a plan to lower diesel prices. Buy Russian! Yes, I kid you not. How special.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't expect to see prices go down for consumers.  I expect instead that the oil companies will take this opportunity to reclaim their lost profits from the recent bottleneck out of the Persian Gulf.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Trump has asked Zelenskyy to stop targeting Russian diesel infrastructure. Zelenskyy refused and Trump said Ukraine needs a new president. Personally I don't think it is Ukraine that needs a new president.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I was in line at the grocery store yesterday and the lady in front of me bought a squash. She was a little perturbed at the $11 price tag.

    The other lady bagging her groceries said she might need to get a part time job just to afford to eat. She was obviously a retiree.

    The Indians are getting restless.

    ReplyDelete
  20.       "Zelenskyy refused."

    More than merely refusing, Zelenskyy took some shots at Trump, although later he thought better of it and let Trump's replies go unanswered.  I think Trump should expect some pushback on that decision from the campaign trail as well.  Certainly the rest of NATO will look at this askance.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Ukraine is popular with bi-partisan support for its fight against Russia. There are also people who do not like the idea of buying fuel from Russia when they are under sanction.

    ReplyDelete
  22.       "There are also people who do not like the idea of buying fuel
          from Russia when they are under sanction."


    Trump has ostensibly set aside those sanctions by decree.  This Congress isn't going to hold him to compliance with the governing law when he's issued a decree in violation of the law.  I don't think his Federalist Society judicial majority will hold him to compliance either.
    However, there are politicians both in D.C. and in Brussels who strongly disapprove of backing off the oil sanctions against Russia.  And Trump's been losing stature with a lot of them.

    That doesn't mean Trump will let up on Ukraine.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It appears the Trump administration may have quietly cut off defensive intelligence sharing with Ukraine, leaving them vulnerable to air attacks from Russia.
    I'd reckon the Ukrainians have at least another three weeks to navigate this betrayal.  It is possible that Trump will back off his support for Putin after the mid-term elections.  But, that's not guaranteed, and it may not even be probable.

    And Trump has announced the immediate commencement of "massive" drilling in Greenland for oil and gas to be controlled by the United States.  (All news to Greenland so far as I can tell.)  Trump's obviously trying very hard to jawbone diesel and gasoline prices down in the few weeks that remain before the November elections.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Trump has rejected the now traditional international monitors for the upcoming mid-term elections.  TheHill  Doesn't take a genius to figure out why.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I heard somewhere that the Star Link feed has been somewhat restored. Don't know if that is true or not. But Trump appears to be getting more desperate as the impact of higher gas prices rolls down hill into consumers pocketbooks. He is trying to pressure everyone to improve his cohorts chances of reelection. Betraying Ukraine, and ultimately his own country, may not be the best way to do that.

    However, I think you mentioned earlier that it is doubtful that any agreement with Russia would really improve the situation with the prices anyway. And, it may be too late.

    ReplyDelete
  26.       "…it is doubtful that any agreement with Russia would really
          improve the situation with the prices anyway. And, it may be
          too late."


    Trump was hoping the mere announcement of the waiver of sanctions on Russian diesel would be enough to create a market effect.  That was a vain hope.  Trump has lost his credibility with the markets as well as with politicians who deal with him.  And the markets know that the initial supplies of diesel will be snapped up by buyers with pipeline access to the Russian distilleries, i.e. Europe and western and central Asia.
    And, in any case, it is indeed coming too late to penetrate the American voters' perceptions of Trump's performance.

    As for the Starlink being partially restored, Musk can see which way the election is heading as well as Trump can.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Musk has injected millions of dollars into the Republican reelection coffers. He seems to be hedging his bets.

    ReplyDelete
  28. As I remember that didn't work too well for him in Wisconsin.

    ReplyDelete
  29. It seems Trump hasn't yet figured out whom to blame for the throttling of Ukraine's air defense system.  They tried to blame Elon Musk, but Musk declined to stand still for that.  So now they gotta find someone else.  Trump's latest pronouncement on the subject was that neither he nor Musk were responsible.  (That's gonna haunt him later.)  He shed no light on the selection of a designated fall guy.  The Pentagon has ceased answering questions on the matter.
    Whomever the blame ultimately falls on is a sideshow to the real problem for Trump, which is his discovery of how unpopular that move has been within in Trumpkan/Republican alliance.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Headline:  "Trump issues order to bypass Russian sanctions in bill named for late Lindsey Graham
    This general waiver is in addition to Trump's earlier waiver of specifically diesel fuel sanctions.

    So…  Trump's doubling down on his support for Putin.  We'll have to see how well that plays out in the November elections.  (Might come too late to make any difference.)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Headline (Reuters):  "Rubio says Trump to take up to 60 days to weigh Russia sanctions"

    Looks like the blow back has caught Trump's attention.  He sent Rubio out to try to knock down some of the heat.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Huh! Wait long enough and the winds change. Hopefully he does the TACO thing again, like with the livesteam of the execution.

    I will probably still do my Betrayal post anyway. When I get the time to write it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Trump isn't giving Rubio's effort much support.  Instead he's ragging on Zelenskyy again.

    ReplyDelete

No gratuitous cussin' or provocations thereto :)