Apparently the FBI has asked Apple to
create software that will unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino
shooter, as they seem to think there may be information on the phone
that may prove useful in further investigations. Despite a court
order Apple has refused, saying this would set a dangerous precedent.
I have to admit that I am struggling
with this. I do not see the difference between unlocking a phone,
which has private information on it, from unlocking a home, which has
private information in it. Obviously a court has the power to issue
a search warrant, allowing law enforcement to enter and search a
private home. Apple's argument that code is speech, and thus
protected under the First Amendment, would seem to me, in this case,
to take second place to law enforcement's right to pursue their
investigation of criminal activity.
I have to wonder if Apple is really
concerned more about the First Amendment or more about the possible
loss of future sales due to people being upset with the possibility
of someone having access to their phone?
I also have to wonder how difficult it is to unlock an iPhone, as there seem to be any number of videos on YouTube on how to do it?